ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY

Institute of Social Sciences

http://www.sbe.itu.edu.tr/sts

 

 

ESST

THE EUROPEAN INTER-UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION on SOCIETY, SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY

http://www.esst.uio.no

 

THE ESST MA

 

Possible Social Impacts of E-Government

 

A case study of Turkey

 

Şadi Evren ŞEKER

 

2004

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 

I would like to thank to my supervisor Dr. Iştar Gözaydın, for opening a new window to the social sciences in my world during her lectures and her encouraging support during my studies.

 

I would also like to express my special gratitude to Prof. Dr. A. C. Cem Say, for leading me on research methodologies and academic life. The very precious thing that I have learned from him is the question for research which he always attempts to apply his theoretical knowledge into daily life while he searches for reality.

 

I would like to thank to Prof. Dr. Şebnem Baydere for her orientations to an academic world. She taught me how to transform knowledge into useful products of intellectuality. She had enlightened my pace through the importance of truth.

 


 

Table of Contents

 

1.     Introduction. 5

2.     E-Government 6

2.1.      What is E-Government?. 6

2.2.      Dimensions of e-government 8

3.     Turkey as a case study. 16

3.1.      Actors network. 16

3.1.1.       Inquiry and ANT. 22

3.2.      Systems approach and large technological systems. 27

3.2.1.       E-Government as a Large Technological System.. 29

Evolution. 33

3.2.2.       Technological Determinism.. 36

3.3.      social constructivism of e-government (SCOT model) 37

4.     Conclusion. 39

5.     References. 40

Appendices. 42

Appendix I 42

Some of the e-government applications from turkey. 42

Appendix II 45

E-government, from the organizations that Turkey is a candidate or member. 45

APPENDIX III 48

Legal infrastructure plans for Turkish e-transformation. 48

APPENDIX IV                                                                                                                    51

INQUIRY RESULTS                                                                                                          51


 

 

 

 

 

ABBREVATIONS

 

ANT    Actor Network Theory

B2B     Business to Business

DPT     Devlet Planlama Teskilati (State Planning Organization)

HTML Hyper Text Markup Language

ICT      Information and Communication Technologies

IT         Information Technology

KIT      Kamu Iktisadi Tesebbusleri (State Economic Enterprises)

NGO   Non Governmental Organization

SCOT  Social Constructivism of Technology

STS     Science Technology and Society

TBD     Turkiye Bilisim Dernegi, (Informatics Association Of Turkey)

US       United States

URL     Unique Resource Locator

USD    United States Dollar

XML    Extensible Markup Language

 


 

1.     Introduction

 

In recent days, e-government is a popular subject in Turkey. Fresh political will and the effect of European Union, draw a directed path for e-government applications in Turkey. Besides the numerous studies in technological or judicial studies, there are only a few studies from the perspective of society. In this study we have targeted a more focused path by following the theoretical background of Science Technology and Society. The most common theories like Actor Network Theory, Systems Approach or Social Constructivism of Technology is shortly described just before the commenting and modeling e-government in Turkey. On the other hand we have published a web site holding an inquiry which contains questions about the e-government in Turkey.

 

By the help of theoretical modeling and results from inquiry we have searched the answers of following questions:

 

  • ”Can E-Government be shaped by the cultural or social effects, or does the governance have a uniform shape?”
  • “Do we shape technology for our purpose or does the technology shape our life by e-government.”
  • “What are the subconscious of Turkish society about the technology, development or social constructivism.”

 

In fact these questions can be answered by deeply detailed and almost infinitive perspectives, but our purpose in this study is only limited by the perspectives of STS studies and Turkish case. At the best of our knowledge there was no such research exists during our studies.

 

 

2.     E-Government

2.1.     What is E-Government?

 

Before commenting about e-government you can find some definitions of the e-government below:

“Digital government or –following the current technolinguistic conventions, e-government- can be defined as the civil and political conduct of government, including service provision, using information and communication technologies. “ , Ahmed(2001)

 

“eGovernment is the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) to improve the activities of public sector organizations.” , Heeks(2004)

 

“At its core, eGovernment is about the changing nature of relationships from hierarchical command and control, to an interactive collaboration between government and citizens, businesses, public sector employees, and other governments. It is about opening the doors to multi-channel interaction and service delivery. And it is about having centralized, yet distributed operations to maximize efficiencies, productivity, and service delivery.”, Mtwcorp(2004)

“The term (in all its uses) is generally agreed to derive from electronic which introduces the notion and practicalities of 'electronic technology' into the various dimensions and ramifications of government 

The most frequent use of the term eGovernment (also spelled e-government as well as egovernment, Egovernment, E-government, E-Government, e-Gov, egov, EGOV, E-GOV and EGovernment and described as online government) is related to:

  • the delivery of public services, where there is an 'online' or Internet based aspect to the delivery of the services (online government services are sometimes called e-services
  • the conduct of government business where the activities of those involved in the process of government itself (such as legislators and the legislative process) where some electronic or online aspect is under consideration.
  • voting where some online aspect is under consideration.”, Freedictionary(2004)

Definition of e-government may differ from author to author but their intersection is the digitization of governmental operations. This digitization may occur in two different domains.

  1. The server domain, which is inside the government
  2. The client domain, which is the interface of governmental operation to the people and other administrative entities.

 

The former domain may contain the communication and integrity of the different governmental entities on the other hand latter domain holds the whole exterior world.

 

The aim of e-government is the supply of technology for the governmental issues. Since governmental entities deal with whole population of the country there are always more and more jobs to handle in a reasonable time and with a reasonable cost. So governments should find a solution to increase the efficiency of their operations. On the other hand the necessity of electronic medium is based on the citizens, companies and foreign governments who switch to the electronic medium.

 

The question rises at this point is how much electronic is a government? A government may be publishing only static web pages to inform citizens or a government may carry its all operations on a fully automated electronic medium.

 

We will find an answer to the levels of electrification of a government in the following chapters, but like most of the similar technologies, by electrification of a conventional system we loose something while gaining others. This thesis study will try to uncover these unmentioned sacrifices.

Let’s try to understand e-government and its dimensions better.

 

 

2.2.     Dimensions of e-government

In the following list we have tried to list all possible dimensions of e-government. Most of the following items can be categorized as an advantage or disadvantage from the perspective of government or citizen, since we believe both of these perspectives have different desires. Besides we have left these items with only small comments to ignite the question marks of reader. The examples and discussions are selected from the Turkey domain to make our case study more successful. The more detailed queries will be powered by these dimensions in the following chapter.

  • Employment: decreasing the number of employees without decreasing the throughput in any organization can be counted as an advantage. E-government is away of decreasing the number of jobs because most of the job will be migrated to the automated software but unfortunately e-government requires more qualified personal. So e-government creates unemployment for unskilled employees while creating new jobs for qualified personals.
  • Privacy: Privacy has a strong relation with the ethnic structure of the population. A successful e-government application should obey the privacy rules of the society. On the other hand there are some universal privacy rules like Universal Declaration of Human Rights”. In the twelfth article it is written as quoted below:

“Article 12: No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.“

·        Privacy This is a huge subject, the definition of family, the cultural role of privacy. Since each society has its own cultural background, the term privacy may differ from society to society. Unfortunately the only privacy criteria for the e-government applications in Turkey, is imported from European Union. Besides the question, “What is the privacy for a Turkish individual or family” leaves open ended in today’s applications.

We should be aware of the two ends of this dimension. On the one hand we have the transparency on the other hand we have the privacy. More privacy yields less transparency and more transparency yields more privacy.

  • Reliability. Electronic applications may be counted as more reliable and robust systems than the human employment. Although there is human employment in the electronic model of government, the human factor is relatively skilled (educated) and error detection is easier. So electronic systems reduces the human factor by adding the machine factor (both has different kinds of errors).
  • In the electronic applications, optimization is easier. Gathering statistical information and reporting is easier than the paper based documentation. So governments can make strategic plans depending on the characteristics of the society.

In fact, word “optimization” can have many meanings, we only use this word as the optimization in the decision phase of governmental operations. Moreover the word “optimization”, can be settled as the optimization of whole these parameters.

  • Mechanization of the system is possible by the e-government. For example there are employees to simply filing documents in conventional systems. Or the census can be automatically handled in the e-government solutions. One of the results of e-government may be the interaction between citizens and the e-government. Since computers are lack of natural language or joking abilities, mechanization of a conventional governmental operation may be a torture for the computer illiterate, old people for example. Although the call centers can be considered as a solution to such problems, mechanization of any component in the system effects the other components, like the mechanization of society.
  • Security problem. In our poll results security is considered as the biggest disadvantage of e-government. Despite the secure online operations available on the Internet like Internet banking, the Turkish society does not feel secure on the Internet. While 100% security is never possible on the Internet and society is aware of this fact and they see the governmental data as a strategic entity, they agree on the security as the biggest disadvantage. As a dimension, the more security makes things harder and less security makes the system more user friendly, easy to access. For example entering your password in each pages bores after an amount of browsing, on the other hand not asking any password after entering a site creates security gaps. Again in Turkish e-government case, I think the decision will differ by the time and experiences.

While preparing this thesis, I could not reach any formal study on the optimum security. The banks and companies operating in Turkey with more experience on the online transactions and Internet have never published such a document. Besides, there are lots of differences from application to application. In one of the Internet banking application, they advertise the amount of time you spend to make a simple operation, while another advertises the number of security questions. So this shows a disagreement on the level of security. I think a study on the forbearance of Turkish society and required level of security in the Internet operations is something needed before the implementation of e-government.

  • Technological determinism. Despite the reduction in the number of people employed in the system is an advantage, less people will be aware of the design of the system, (less information in the design phase) which is one of the reasons of the isolation of the system. On the other hand a new generation who do not need social relations and sunk to the technological applications will grow. Also substituting with a more complicated system makes the system less understandable and less discussable. These are where technological determinism and the systems approach ignited. Of course this is not an unsolvable problem, but the social design of the system is more complicated than the design of the system. Again this dimension of e-government will be discussed in the following chapter.
  • Cost. What is the cost of e-government and what is the cost of conventional systems, what are the operational costs, what is the initial cost are the subjects of this dimension. For example in the US case, there are lots of critics on the budget and e-government spends. Smith(2004). In Turkish State Planning Organization declares the year 2003 spends as 1,000,000 USD[1] and planning to sped 2,000,000USD in 2004, DPT(2003), Unfortunately Turkey is lack of discussions on this spends, the only discussion I have discovered during the search for this thesis is in e-mail groups related to the e-government discussions. In the e-mail groups, the necessity of national operating system and office applications and the insufficient budget for IT is criticized.
  • Psychological effects. Besides the other dimensions, electronic government makes computers necessary in our daily life. This reality makes the human-computer interaction more important. In my limited search during this thesis I have faced with several risks of computers.[2] There are many studies about ergonomics for example.[3] Or another risk is the CVS (Computer Vision Syndrome). For example a research on “Effect of Computer Training on Students’ Health” underlines a fact as below:

Figure 1 Eye diseases related to computers, Kahn (200)

By the light of above, government offices should continue human to human interaction (on the other hand we have citizens with disabilities) and in the education system, citizens should be became conscious about the healthy usage of computers.

  • The judicial background of the e-government. Are there any inevitable conventional paper based necessities? For example the petitions should have wet inked signatures up until august 2004 in Turkey. Just after the first day of august 2004, digital signature is accepted legal. For more information please refer to the Appendix III legal infrastructure plans for Turkish e-transformation.
  • Upgrades. The technological background of the e-government. Since the technology has an upgrade momentum, it is inevitable that the e-government applications will be upgraded. This creates a new market for the software developers (especially the biggest developer companies)[4]. This upgrades courses the common sense to a linear feeling, because the idea of “a new upgrade is better than the older and it is the most correct substitution of the old one, it is necessary to upgrade, etc.” creates such linearity. In the course of this linear feeling, technological determinism may sprout.
  • Disaster plans. None of the governments want to loose all governmental information in a single disaster. So making a disaster plan is necessary. (Copying electronic information is easier).
  • Electronic Disasters. There are only electronic specific problems like y2k, or the magnetic field of earth or sun explosions are the electronic specific problems, these problems do not occur on paper based systems for example.
  • Inconsistency. There are many independent governmental organizations and each organization may try to apply its own e-government solution or ERP which can yield the inconsistency. For example there are more than thirty thousand municipalities in Turkey, besides governorships, police departments, military bases, healthcare systems, and other governmental departments. Each of these administrative entities may use different kinds of e-government solutions which are inconsistent. To solve these problems, in computer science there are new generation languages just created to make data consistency like XML, which declares only the tags of data and creates a flexible medium for data interaction. Below are quotations from US, which underline, how XML fits the e-government requirements:

"XML would be a key solution of any segment of e-government we go with," said Mayi Canales, deputy chief information officer at the Treasury Department and an e-government portfolio coordinator at the CIO Council.

"I think you're going to find a little bit of XML in all of the initiatives," said Lew Sanford, e-government program manager for the General Services Administration. "This is what it was designed to do."

In several reports, it is underlined that any government wants to implement a healthy e-government application, should declare XML schema open to the whole world TBD(2004). Besides the applications running over XML, Turkey is lack of such an online XML schema data source.

  • Appropriate technology. In Turkish case[5], the technology settled is not a national product. Since e-government is a large technological system[6], both the hardware and software is imported from the foreign companies with the foreign philosophies. In fact there is an ongoing debate about “Do artifacts have politics?”. From the same subjected paper of Winner(1986), I want to quote two of the many impressive examples.
    1. the bridges over the parkways of Long Island, New York. Winner notes that many of the overpasses are extraordinarily low, having as little as nine feet of clearance at the curb. Winner interprets this design as a limit of access of racial minorities and low-income groups, since these bridges leaves a passage to automobile-owning whites of ‘upper’ and ‘comfortable’ middle classes and limits the passage of poor people and blacks, who normally used public transit, which are twelve-foot tall buses and could not get through the overpass.
    2. The atom bomb, which he accepts as an inherently political artifact. He explains this argue by the centralized structure of atom bomb. Rigidly hierarchical chain of command closed to all influences that might make its workings unpredictable. The internal social system of the bomb must be authoritarian.

I have quoted these two examples because of their extreme similarities to the e-government. First, e-government is only accessible from the internet and we should raise the question how many of the Turkish citizens does have an internet access? By the end of 2001, the intern